| To: | jmp-l@lists.biostat.wustl.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Survival analysis |
| From: | Bassam A Dahman/HSC/VCU <bdahman@vcu.edu> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:36:38 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <F5CC293600CBD34EAE18786E01870829040AD1DE@amfrk-cougar.Sygen.SygenInternational.com> |
|
For the survivors you have to put (Survival time = the time till end of the study), it cannot be missing or a fake value Bassam
Subject: Survival data analysis using Fixed Censoring (right censoring). I have two treatments and group of subjects within each treatment that some have died during the test period while others survived to the end. Those that died have a `death_age', while all the survivals (censored) have missing values. I produced a new column called censored where dead animals get a value of 0 and survivals get a value of 1. The objective is to test if there is a difference in survivability between the two treatments. Is this the right way to arrange this data? Should I give the survival a `fake' death_age (999)? What option of the survival analysis would work best (proportional hazard, survival, parametric etc.). Thanks. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Survival analysis, Nader Deeb |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 4 questions concerning repeated measures analysis in JMP, François Vézina |
| Previous by Thread: | Survival analysis, Nader Deeb |
| Next by Thread: | 4 questions concerning repeated measures analysis in JMP, François Vézina |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |