Just wondering, if na.action=na.exclude would work? Try it! The default is
na.action=na.fail.
Thanks,
Pravin
Pravin Jadhav
-----Original Message-----
From: s-news-owner@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
[mailto:s-news-owner@lists.biostat.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of F Z
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 1:18 AM
To: Cougar@psu.edu; s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
Subject: Re: [S] lme
try using na.omit nested within the Data argument. i.e.
m1<-lme(Var1~Var2, data= na.omit(MyData), random= ~1|Var3)
Cheers
Francisco
>From: "Frank Lawrence" <Cougar@psu.edu>
>To: <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu>
>Subject: [S] lme
>Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:29:54 -0400
>
>I notice that lme does not tolerate missing data on the response variable.
>Is there a way to have lme use FIML?
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Frank R. Lawrence
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>This message was distributed by s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu. To
>unsubscribe send e-mail to s-news-request@lists.biostat.wustl.edu with
>the BODY of the message: unsubscribe s-news
_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu. To
unsubscribe send e-mail to s-news-request@lists.biostat.wustl.edu with
the BODY of the message: unsubscribe s-news
|