s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

Fin-Metrics parameter values

To: "S-Plus newsgroup" <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu>
Subject: Fin-Metrics parameter values
From: "James Dartnall" <J.E.DARTNALL@soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:24:16 +0100
Dear all,

Does anyone use the S-Plus add-on, "splus fin-metrics".  If so I have a
question.

I am still learning how to use fin-metrics and as so am following examples
in books.  One example in the book 'Time Series Analysis by State Space
Methods' [by] Durbin and Koopman concerns the well known introduction of
compulsory seat-belt wearing in the front of cars in Jan 1983 in the
Britain.  In their example Durbin and Koopman initially fit a structural
model with components: level and trigonometric seasonal (no slope) to the
whole series (1969 - 1984 inclusive) of logged number of drivers who were
killed or seriously injured in road accidents in Britain.  They obtain the
following parameter estimates:

estimated variances of disturbances
level: 0.00093585
seasonal trig: 5.0109e-007
irregular: 0.0034160

log-likelihood: 435.295
prediction error variance: 0.00586998

My problem is that splus gives me different values; the estimated
disturbance variances I get are out by only a minute amount which doesn't
concern me but the log-likelihood and prediction error variance are out by a
considerable amount.  I get:

168.8588 and 0.9999... respectively.

s-plus tells me that Kalman filtering failed, could this be the problem? and
if so why are my estimated variances of disturbances pretty much correct -
these I used to get the prediction error variance.

hope I haven't gone on for too long, thanks in advance for help

James





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Fin-Metrics parameter values, James Dartnall <=