| To: | s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | deconvolution |
| From: | Xao Ping <xao_ping@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:15:14 -0700 (PDT) |
|
Dear All:
Suppose that I have a sample Y. Suppose also that it is known that Y=X+E where X is considered as a signal and E as noise. The PDFs of X and E are known: F(y, theta) and
G(e, xi). Parameters theta and xi are also a priori known. Given all this knowledge,
is that possible to estimate signal X? Just to be precise, I need to substitute each data point in Y by the predicted Y' in such a way as it would be, in a sense, closer to X than in the original sample Y.
Thank you
Xao Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: lag down, Peng Huang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: deconvolution, Spencer Graves |
| Previous by Thread: | Is there a multiple-comparisons approach for survival curves?, david . thompson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: deconvolution, Spencer Graves |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |