| To: | <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Advice on repeated measures |
| From: | <Andre.Mery@aventis.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:07:12 +0200 |
| Thread-index: | AcSOieGsyMSQr0YcSLa0z03LTV45zw== |
| Thread-topic: | Advice on repeated measures |
|
Dear all,
I would appreciate an advice on how to
perform a repeated measurement analysis with "lme".
Basically, the data I have are as
follows:
Animal Housing
Group Day Score
(...) (...)
(...) (...) (...)
- Housing is a factor with 2
levels
- Group is a factor with 4
levels
- Day is a factor with 12
levels
For each Animal (belonging to a particular
Housing level and a particular Group level, 12 measures or Score are made on the
12 differents days. Data are balanced (no Housing level, no Group level, no Day
level, are missing for any Animal)
In the treatment of similar data (the
so-called "Sitka" example), Venables & Ripley (their book, p.206 in the 3rd
edition) use the code:
lme(size ~
treat*ordered(Time), random = ~ 1 | tree, data = "">
*
*
*
1°) In my case, I want to differentiate
the 2 Housing levels (is there a significant difference between them?), taking
Group as a covariate. So, is it sounded to copy the previous code and to adapt
it by using::
lme(Score ~
Group + Housing*ordered(Day), random = ~ 1 - Animal, data = ""
???
*
*
*
2°) If I do this, a call to "summary" gives
me:
Fixed
effects: Score ~ Group + Housing * ordered(Day)
Value Std.Error DF t-value p-value (Intercept) 1.512500 0.0881239 858 17.16333 <.0001 Group -0.021667 0.0203514 77 -1.06463 0.2904 Housing -0.016667 0.0455070 77 -0.36624 0.7152 ordered(Day)^1 -0.386762 0.1626184 858 -2.37834 0.0176 (...)
Housingordered(Day)^11 0.082391 0.1028489 858
0.80109 0.4233
Can I readily conclude that Housing#1 is not
different from Housing#2 (due to p-value = 0.7152) ???
*
*
*
I am not really sure of what
is the proper treatment of repeated data with "lme". Taking the format of
my data, I would appreciate to know whether you think a simple treatment
like the previous one is enough to get a conclusion on Housing#1 versus
Housing#2, or if I should use something else more appropriate.
Thanks.
André
Méry |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: another counting question, Bill.Venables |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: cluster simulation, Rolf Turner |
| Previous by Thread: | another counting question, Leeds, Mark |
| Next by Thread: | ICC from lme / reliability coefficient, Karin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |