Mail Archive Search: <+from:FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>

Results:

References: [ +from:FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Concerns about SPLUS version 7 (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:41:35 -0300; Kevin, your perspective on S vs R comes closest to my own. And with respect to renewing the S license, the driving force is maintaining web-based applications that would otherwise have to be converte; /archives/html/s-news/2005-07/msg00078.html (12,376 bytes)
2. aggregate.data.frame with too many dimensions (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:18:34 -0400; This is a revisit of a question posed by Jeremy Stanley in March 2004. The issue is failure of the aggregate function as the number of records, by and summary columns increases. The earlier question; /archives/html/s-news/2005-02/msg00126.html (9,499 bytes)
3. Re: Bug in Fisher Exact test? (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:24:13 -0300; t cases and; /archives/html/s-news/2004-08/msg00155.html (11,198 bytes)
4. Re: Help in extending the user interface (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 10:44:00 -0300; The function below creates a dialog using a variety of options, besides just one for your example. It might help you to get started. Either create the default picks as variables or just edit the get; /archives/html/s-news/2004-05/msg00081.html (20,228 bytes)
5. Re: simple concatenation question (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 08:20:42 -0300; Possibly all you want is; whatever<-paste(test,collapse=" ") e.g. [1] "no 1" "no 2" "no 3" [1] "no 1 no 2 no 3" --Original Message-- From: Johnnidis, Jonathan [mailto:Jonathan.Johnnidis@joslin.harvar; /archives/html/s-news/2004-05/msg00105.html (8,945 bytes)
6. Re: error: too many databases attached (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:45:52 -0400; More information is probably needed to give you a useful answer. The script itself or a simplified derivation just to illustrate the necessary logic around the attachments would be helpful. Do you a; /archives/html/s-news/2004-03/msg00139.html (8,605 bytes)
7. Re: Character transformation (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:26:12 -0400; Try format(), e.g.: [1] 2.37 5.42 8.00 9.46 [1] "2.37" "5.42" "8" "9.46" [1] "2.37" "5.42" "8.00" "9.46" Hi, I have a little question: when I transform a numeric variable, with a fixed digit number,; /archives/html/s-news/2004-03/msg00148.html (7,870 bytes)
8. Re: for loop problems (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:24:43 -0400; UX_matrix(nrow=dim(X)[1],ncol=dim(X)[2]) for(a in 1:p) { UX[,a] <- c(X[, a]/normx[a]) } --Original Message-- From: Russell.Ivory@MerrickBank.com [mailto:Russell.Ivory@MerrickBank.com] Sent: Tuesday,; /archives/html/s-news/2004-02/msg00086.html (14,206 bytes)
9. Re: Saving intermediate values while running scripts (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:13:44 -0400; Something like: assign("var1", var1, w = 1, immediate=T) assign("var2", var2, w = 1, immediate=T) assign("var3", var3, w = 1, immediate=T) saves the results, but by writing them to your working direc; /archives/html/s-news/2004-02/msg00107.html (13,576 bytes)
10. Summary:using magnitudes of F in ANOVA to denote relevance (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 13:18:19 -0300; Summary to the List on Comparing Magnitudes of F's Thanks to all who replied. The discussion is reproduced in chronological order, with some overview perspective at the end. I believe the question ha; /archives/html/s-news/2003-07/msg00032.html (16,638 bytes)
11. msg00144.html (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:51:19 -0300; I had presented the following ANOVA to depict the potential relevance of interactions, where we are seeking to determine if main effects alone could be used to represent the essentials of the model w; /archives/html/s-news/2003-06/msg00144.html (7,885 bytes)
12. Re: model performance with and without interactions... (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 11:53:27 -0300; Yes, we did that. That was exactly the justification for removing interaction terms (the interactions did not suggest troubling differences in trends, just differences like greater and lesser slopes; /archives/html/s-news/2003-06/msg00147.html (12,055 bytes)
13. mcnemar test (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:14:11 -0400; I have paired series of categorical observations of good, bad, or indifferent. Where both x and y exhibit occurrences of the same levels, the test works. However, if a level only occurs for one of x; /archives/html/s-news/2002-12/msg00079.html (6,893 bytes)
14. Re: mcnemars test (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:00:03 -0400; Yesterday I asked for any insights on the failure of mcnemar.test to resolve situations in which either of x or y has levels not obtained for the other. Pete Meyer responded that I might modify the o; /archives/html/s-news/2002-12/msg00088.html (10,366 bytes)
15. Re: mcnemar test (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:53:50 -0400; I had previously modified the mcnemar.test to eliminate cases of zero denominators and decrement the associated degrees of freedom. Heberto Ghezzo advises that the degrees of freedom should not be de; /archives/html/s-news/2002-12/msg00104.html (12,958 bytes)
16. Re: One more thought on McNemar... (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:18:27 -0400; Pete, I certainly agree, and the test does have to be suitable for publication. The real data I'm concerned with is subjective classification of paired hot and freeze brand healing response variables; /archives/html/s-news/2002-12/msg00119.html (12,861 bytes)
17. displaying large numbers (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:35:18 -0400; I wish to display large numbers without scientific notation. I've tried various combinations of print and format without success. As an example, [1] 4.7348e+017 [1] "473482475476473000" [1] "47348247; /archives/html/s-news/2002-11/msg00213.html (6,959 bytes)
18. Cannot get very simple dialogbox to work (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 15:37:13 -0400; I'm familiar with the GUI toolkit functions, but wanted more space than "Wide String" for providing an editable formula box, so thought I would use the editfield.control in a CallBack function. But I; /archives/html/s-news/2002-02/msg00047.html (7,485 bytes)
19. Upper limit to number of properties in FunctionInfo? (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 16:51:24 -0400; A four-tab dialogbox I use to recode factor variables (each possible level a Property) was working fine until I gave it a situation that resulted in over 100 Properties (inclusive of a return value a; /archives/html/s-news/2002-02/msg00085.html (10,705 bytes)
20. Creating tabbed pages in a GUI (score: 1): Author: "Fowler, Mark" <FowlerM@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 16:19:08 -0400; I thought the function below would produce a GUI with 2 pages, each with two check box controls. Instead I get a one-page GUI with all 4 check box controls on it. What am I missing? anybox_function(); /archives/html/s-news/2002-01/msg00054.html (8,101 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]