- 1. "Bug in qwilcox()?" revisited (score: 1)
- Author: Gerrit Eichner <Gerrit.Eichner@math.uni-giessen.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:57:52 +0200 (CET)
- Dear list, in the meantime I've found out that the strange behaviour of qwilcox() for m = n = 36 has its origin in the third line of the following segment of code as it is used in qwilcox(): x <- ((m
- /archives/html/s-news/2003-06/msg00170.html (7,789 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu