Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[S\]\s+S\-plus\s+dictionary\s+of\s+statistical\s+terms\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [S] S-plus dictionary of statistical terms (score: 1)
Author: ritter@stat.ucl.ac.be (Christian Ritter)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 98 16:03:29 +0200
Hi all, Part of the message to all: Sorry for a question which deviates slightly from purely software related ones. Does anyone of you know of an electronic dictionary of statistical terms (such as c
/archives/html/s-news/1998-04/msg00115.html (8,440 bytes)

2. Re: [S] S-plus dictionary of statistical terms (score: 1)
Author: Dylan Bulseco <bulseco@os.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 15:24:28 -0400
You might want to check StatSoft's site for their Electronic Stats textbook at http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html or you can download the entire textbook from the same page. Dylan languag
/archives/html/s-news/1998-04/msg00120.html (9,354 bytes)

3. Re: [S] S-plus dictionary of statistical terms (score: 1)
Author: John Maindonald <john.maindonald@anu.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 09:47:27 +1000 (EST)
Some elements of this are needed as an exercise in getting S-plus technical documentation and output labelling into order. For example we need 1) consistent usage of the terms AIC and Cp, with a clea
/archives/html/s-news/1998-04/msg00124.html (10,529 bytes)

4. RE: [S] S-plus dictionary of statistical terms (score: 1)
Author: "Bock, Juergen (PDBS;Basel)" <JUERGEN.BOCK@Roche.COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 14:29:41 +0200
The following dictonary exists as printed book but the editors have also a WORD file, which could be used as a basis for developing an electronic dictonary. The big advantage: is includes English, F
/archives/html/s-news/1998-04/msg00131.html (9,151 bytes)

5. RE: [S] S-plus dictionary of statistical terms (score: 1)
Author: "Bock, Juergen (PDBS;Basel)" <JUERGEN.BOCK@Roche.COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 15:12:15 +0200
Sorry, in my answer to the question about existing dictonaries I forgot the reference: Rasch et al. (1994): Elsevier's Dictionary of Biometry. Elsevier Science B.V. Amsterdam, London, New York, Tokyo
/archives/html/s-news/1998-04/msg00132.html (8,521 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu