Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[S\]\s+dumping\s+5\.1\s+to\s+Splus\s+2000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[S\]\s+dumping\s+5\.1\s+to\s+Splus\s+2000\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [S] dumping 5.1 to Splus 2000 (score: 1): Author: Simon Jackman <jackman@stanford.edu>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 20:14:25 -0700 (PDT); does anyone have experience with moving objects between Splus 5.1 (linux) and Splus 2000? data.dump() in Splus 5.1 tends to produce dumps with attributes that Splus 2000 can't work with, even with ol; /archives/html/s-news/1999-09/msg00250.html (7,611 bytes)
2. Re: [S] dumping 5.1 to Splus 2000 (score: 1): Author: "Paul Y. Peng" <ypeng@math.mun.ca>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 11:22:39 -0230; I reported the same problem (and problems with dump()) to MathSoft a few weeks ago and they acknowledged that there are bugs in these functions. However I haven't received any solutions from MathSoft; /archives/html/s-news/1999-09/msg00251.html (9,414 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]