Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[S\]\s+sign\s+mail\s+to\s+s\-news\,\s+please\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: "CHASALOW, SCOTT [AG/2170]" <SCOTT.CHASALOW@cereon.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 08:29:12 -0500
If I might make a wee request, could people please sign their email (including email address) sent to s-news. I don't know if it happens locally, or at wubios.wustl.edu, but headers of these message
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00036.html (8,490 bytes)

2. Re: [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: "Timothy J. Wade" <tjwade@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 10:21:31 -0700
I have another request/question for this mailing list: Why is it that answers and/or replies are infrequently posted? Only when the asker summarizes and reposts the answers to we get a view of the re
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00038.html (8,899 bytes)

3. Re: [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zaslavsky <zaslavsk@hcp.med.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 13:34:41 -0400 (EDT)
It is actually a (very soft) recommendation for this list that people follow this practice. It only works if the recipient of these messages holds up her/his end and does the summary. In fact it is
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00039.html (10,022 bytes)

4. Re: [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: rodgers@nlm.nih.gov (R. P. Channing Rodgers, M.D.)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 14:10:25 -0400
Actually, I find that the frequency of posted summaries holds up quite well compared to comparable mailing lists. What is perhaps more troubling is the infrquency with which the summaries contain a c
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00041.html (10,184 bytes)

5. Re: [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: Clark Sims <clark.sims@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 14:45:23 -0500
that a I have often replied outside the mail group because it is easier to just hit the reply button than it is to look up the address of s-news in my address book. It sounds silly, but I usually do
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00044.html (10,632 bytes)

6. Re: [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: "CHASALOW, SCOTT [AG/2170]" <SCOTT.CHASALOW@cereon.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 14:55:45 -0500
Thanks to all who replied to this message. The problem is local; normal people should see the original sender in the "From:" field, and "owner-s-news@wubios.wustl.edu" in the "Sender:" field. I thin
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00045.html (9,211 bytes)

7. RE: [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: "Box, Jim" <box00002@onyx.dcri.duke.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 15:59:17 -0400
Look at aus.stats.s Anything with an [S] has been written to this list. -Jim -- This message was distributed by s-news@wubios.wustl.edu. To unsubscribe send e-mail to s-news-request@wubios.wustl.edu
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00046.html (9,346 bytes)

8. RE: [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: "CHASALOW, SCOTT [AG/2170]" <SCOTT.CHASALOW@cereon.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 15:09:04 -0500
Um, this was the 3rd unsigned email in this thread today... What was that subject line again? - Scott.Chasalow@cereon.com } --Original Message-- } From: owner-s-news@wubios.wustl.edu at INTERNET } Se
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00047.html (8,823 bytes)

9. Re: [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: Todd.Taylor@pnl.gov (Z. Todd Taylor)
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 13:39:29 -0700
This has been discussed before. I'm personally indifferent, but wanted to raise a couple of points of information below. Please note that binary files, HTML, and graphics are NOT welcome in the vast
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00048.html (9,770 bytes)

10. RE: [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: "Timothy J. Wade" <tjwade@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 13:58:00 -0700
I didn't mean to create this flood of turmoil and discontent. I really think this mailing list is an incredible resource but I personally am always in need of programming help, tips and pointers and
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00049.html (9,008 bytes)

11. Re: [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Connolly" <P.Connolly@hort.cri.nz>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 10:22:59 +1200 (NZST)
According to Timothy J. Wade: As someone once said: Don't attribute to malice what could be attributed to ignorance. The fact that others could be interested in the same question is an idea that just
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00051.html (10,294 bytes)

12. Re: [S] sign mail to s-news, please (score: 1)
Author: Bill Venables <wvenable@arcola.stats.adelaide.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 10:37:16 +0930 (CST)
This has apparently become a "reply to the list or not" issue now. Let me tell you a tale... Let me confess that back in the old days when the mailing list was administered from Toronto I was in a cu
/archives/html/s-news/1999-04/msg00053.html (11,086 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu