Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Summary\:\s+bug\-let\s+in\s+predict\.glm\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Summary\:\s+bug\-let\s+in\s+predict\.glm\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Summary: bug-let in predict.glm() (score: 1): Author: "Buttrey, Samuel" <sebuttre@nps.navy.mil>; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:05:58 -0800; Many thanks to those who responded to my question about a bug in David ("MathSoft") Smith said "it looks like a bug..[and] it appears to be fixed in S-PLUS 6." Thanks! Kunio Takezawa had two very hel; /archives/html/s-news/2000-12/msg00047.html (7,614 bytes)
2. Re: Summary: bug-let in predict.glm() (score: 1): Author: Don McKenzie <dmck@silvae.cfr.washington.edu>; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 10:42:11 -0800 (PST); Doesn't this make sense though? On what basis could one predict a response at an unmodelled level of a factor? Thanks for enlightenment.. _____________________________________________________________; /archives/html/s-news/2000-12/msg00055.html (8,017 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]