Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*baseline\s+hazard\s+in\s+Splus\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*baseline\s+hazard\s+in\s+Splus\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. baseline hazard in Splus (score: 1): Author: Eric Wajnberg <wajnberg@sophia.inra.fr>; Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:06:18 +0100; Dear all, There is something I do not understand in fitting a cox regression model in Splus. Ok, I have a model fitted that way: fit<-coxph(Surv(start,stop,event)~ "list of covariates") I know I can; /archives/html/s-news/2008-03/msg00032.html (8,046 bytes)
2. Re: baseline hazard in Splus (score: 1): Author: Terry Therneau <therneau@mayo.edu>; Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:50:56 -0500 (CDT); The question was why coxph.detail(fit) and survfit(fit) give different answers for a fitted Cox model. The answer is that they do give the same answers for me. T [1] 0.9342723 9.7276995 Now, my guess; /archives/html/s-news/2008-03/msg00040.html (8,589 bytes)
3. Re: baseline hazard in Splus (score: 1): Author: Eric Wajnberg <wajnberg@sophia.inra.fr>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:06:36 +0100; Ok, thanks for this reply (and thanks to Matt Austin who also helps). Now I see. My misunderstanding is that I was sure that the coxph.detail()$hazard was the **baseline** hazard (i.e., with all cova; /archives/html/s-news/2008-03/msg00042.html (11,315 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]