Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*bug\s+in\s+timeAlign\s+in\s+S\-PLUS\s+7\.0\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*bug\s+in\s+timeAlign\s+in\s+S\-PLUS\s+7\.0\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. bug in timeAlign in S-PLUS 7.0 (score: 1): Author: Tony Plate <tplate@blackmesacapital.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:13:41 -0600; I noticed that timeAlign() seems broken in S-PLUS 7.0: when given dir=-1, it aligns some days that are the 31st of a month to the next day. S-PLUS 6.X does not have this problem. E.g.: in.format="[%m; /archives/html/s-news/2005-09/msg00050.html (8,499 bytes)
2. Re: bug in timeAlign in S-PLUS 7.0 (score: 1): Author: "David Smith" <dsmith@insightful.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:48:27 -0700; We've looked into it, and it turns out that the actual bug is related to use of relative dates. I've posted additional information at: http://www.insightful.com/insightful_faq/dsp_article.asp?articl; /archives/html/s-news/2005-09/msg00058.html (11,624 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]