Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*dimnames\s+in\s+Sparc\s+Splus\s+6\.0\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*dimnames\s+in\s+Sparc\s+Splus\s+6\.0\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: Gary Sabot <gary@sabot.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 21:12:07 -0400; I'm having a problem involving the behavior of dimnames in the Sparc Splus 6.0 relative to earlier releases (well, relative to Splus 3.3 where it worked fine, and relative to 3.4 with the dimnames bu; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00020.html (10,349 bytes)
2. dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: Gary Sabot <gary@sabot.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 12:48:37 -0400; To: s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu From: Gary Sabot <gary@sabot.com> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 21:12:07 -0400 Subject: [S] dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 I'm having a problem involving the behavior of dimna; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00028.html (9,803 bytes)
3. Re: dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: Tim Hesterberg x319 <timh@insightful.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:01:12 -0700; Gary Sabot just posted a version of [.data.frame for which X[,aSingleColumn] # where X is a data frame adds the row names of the data frame as names to the vector that is returned. Unfortunately, tha; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00034.html (10,685 bytes)
4. Re: dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: Gary Sabot <gary@sabot.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 18:22:09 -0400; To: Gary Sabot <gary@sabot.com> From: Tim Hesterberg x319 <timh@insightful.com> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:01:12 -0700 Subject: Re: [S] dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 Gary Sabot just posted a version of [; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00035.html (15,678 bytes)
5. Re: dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: Terry Therneau <therneau@mayo.edu>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 17:35:22 -0500 (CDT); Partly to provide information, partly to be contrary perhaps, let me comment a bit on Tim's comments. The "problem" -- Gary Sabot would like the results of x[, aSingleColum], where x is a data frame,; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00036.html (11,087 bytes)
6. Re: dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: Prof Brian D Ripley <ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 07:53:45 +0100 (BST); (right, so users should be able to remove names or extract without names. They should also be able to extract with names.) That's not the point. In a data frame, the row.names apply to the rows, so t; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00038.html (11,083 bytes)
7. Re: dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: Tim Hesterberg x319 <timh@insightful.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:51:30 -0700; Brian Ripley wrote on Sept 6: Since starting at Insightful, I have found people here to be very conservative about changing code in ways that may be backwardly incompatible. However, there are cases; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00108.html (12,064 bytes)
8. Re: dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: Tim Hesterberg x319 <timh@insightful.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:53:41 -0700; This message contains * comments on implementation details of versions of [.data.frame posted Sept 6 * recommend that you not mask [.data.frame; safer alternative * comments on old-style vs new-style; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00110.html (15,202 bytes)
9. Re: dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: Prof Brian D Ripley <ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk>; Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 07:15:02 +0100 (BST); [...] [...] From the help page under S-PLUS 6.0 on Solaris: dup.names.ok a logical flag; if TRUE then duplicate row names are allowed. so it was not documented correctly by Insightful! Isn't it about; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00113.html (9,149 bytes)
10. Re: dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: Frank E Harrell Jr <fharrell@virginia.edu>; Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:57:48 -0400; I would like to give the strongest possible second to Terry's note. The current design of SV4 is seriously broken. I have turned to some of the greatest S programmers in the world to try to fix the a; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00117.html (14,371 bytes)
11. Re: dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: "David Smith" <dsmith@insightful.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 09:58:04 -0700; I'll have to take exception to some of Frank's comments here. In particular, he says "the current design of SV4 is seriously broken". It ain't broken -- it's just different. I can't speak for John Ch; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00121.html (20,840 bytes)
12. Re: dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: Frank E Harrell Jr <fharrell@virginia.edu>; Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:37:01 -0400; You don't need to be forgiven for contrariness so don't worry. My choice of the word "broken" could have been better. Let's call it "problematic". I think the places where we have differing views re; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00124.html (10,117 bytes)
13. Re: dimnames in Sparc Splus 6.0 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Hutchinson" <hutch@phz.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:51:30 -0400; David, I applaud your efforts to maintain as much backwards-compatibility as possible when moving to Sv4 and I don't doubt that it was a challenge. Nonetheless, I would not categorize the "dimnames; /archives/html/s-news/2001-09/msg00136.html (9,718 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]