jmp-l
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: interpretation categorical variables

from [Mark Bailey] [Bookmark Link][Original]
To: jmp-l@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
Subject: Re: interpretation categorical variables
From: Mark Bailey <mark4flies@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:46:13 -0400
In-reply-to: <20080717111310.3948657B52@lucano110.uco.es>
References: <20080717111310.3948657B52@lucano110.uco.es>
No, it is not common at all. I think that it is unique to JMP.

On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:12 AM, Tom Vanwalleghem wrote:

Is this approach common practice (read: acceptable) when reporting research
results? Truth is I´ve never seen this approach in research articles before.

-Mark

Computers are useless. All they give you are answers. (Pablo Picasso)

=
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: interpretation categorical variables, Friedman, Emil
Next by Date:  Re: interpretation categorical variables, Mark Bailey
Previous by Thread:  Re: interpretation categorical variables, Friedman, Emil
Next by Thread:  Re: interpretation categorical variables, Mark Bailey
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]