jmp-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Any good way to deal with non-normal distributed data for Control L

To: jmp-l@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
Subject: Re: Any good way to deal with non-normal distributed data for Control Limit/Cpk analysis?
From: Fred Zhang <ieaggie2009@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:59:59 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1+/cIti2qhwXQImyTZkdUh79Wmy5XG0+p5QgzMfVLyY=; b=EY/RAU9BZEwVKoqGbq+3/0QxKSZlw2OpcRbmh2cdBBrxddOV0rbMuHNXd5OIf4bSI5 ow3IER8ULKKa+A7pLJaE+JG4df20i2qRVYlKPuoNGC79bqtqhXyvJbqaXedIErjf1oD6 wGeXhL7v69vf6GNG+9l55xf3CszWtUcVGlwqA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JFnvMoKgL3i1VHs3Hauschp+M+4Chf0O9//TcwOqimFPqVtZ3g8g0fOV9Ee6NqAPKf zsBYhgthObAK8DNuyNbOqZuS2n6C/AwytApwpng/83WDQWssBOXK9GagUR0f1RfPQM0P 5QCEzQTjPoc+r2EMDTtmNDg/Uqj8jXhqAfFzQ=
In-reply-to: <429947.79938.qm@web30805.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <25e89e790903030646y1ede3af4r216aa1586bb731d1@mail.gmail.com> <429947.79938.qm@web30805.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
any more detailed comments how to do that in JMP?


 
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:52 AM, chem engineer <chemical_engr@yahoo.com> wrote:
you will need to do a data transform


From: Fred Zhang <ieaggie2009@gmail.com>
To: jmp-l@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2009 9:46:21 AM
Subject: [jmp-l] Any good way to deal with non-normal distributed data for Control Limit/Cpk analysis?

We have so many different types of non-normal distributed data from the practical scenarioes.

Now we try to determine the control limit, the Cpk, or the meaningful mean and deviation.
So any idea how we can do in JMP to propose good way to achieve the above analysis?
All data are continuous variable type.
Sometimes the data are always falling into limited categories,
or they have a very long rail to the right or the left,
or there are a very few points far away from the others although they are acceptale and reasonable,
etc.

Thanks a lot.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>