| To: | Patrick Connolly <PConnolly@grunt.marc.cri.nz> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [S] reasonable p-values for Fisher exact's test - WAS strange ... |
| From: | Lutz Prechelt <prechelt@ira.uka.de> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Mar 1998 16:17:15 +0100 |
| Cc: | cberry@tajo.ucsd.edu (Charles C. Berry), s-news@wubios.wustl.edu (Snews) |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Wed, 25 Mar 1998 13:17:52 +1200." <199803250117.NAA02559@grunt.marc.cri.nz> |
| Sender: | owner-s-news@wubios.wustl.edu |
PConnolly@grunt.marc.cri.nz said: > Is there a fundamental difference in the way different machines so > such calculations? First of all, we are talking about floating point arithmetic here, which is generally imprecise. Second, all processors today are supposed to (and claim to) work according to the same IEEE floating point standard. Hence, the results _should_ all be the same. Third, however, rounding is underspecified in the IEEE standard and essentially each processor type does it in a slightly different way. This is why differences may occur. Lutz ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was distributed by s-news@wubios.wustl.edu. To unsubscribe send e-mail to s-news-request@wubios.wustl.edu with the BODY of the message: unsubscribe s-news |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [S] Unusual result -- A glitch, I'd say, Paul A Tukey |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [S] Question - Coding numeric vectors, Christian Keller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [S] Unusual result, Berwin Turlach |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [S] reasonable p-values for Fisher exact's test - WAS strange ..., Patrick Connolly |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |