s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re[2]: [S] Possible Statistical Enhancements to S-PLUS

To: Patrick Connolly <PConnolly@grunt.marc.cri.nz>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [S] Possible Statistical Enhancements to S-PLUS
From: Barry Courtois <courtois@topaz.cfas.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 16:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Cc: jxs@dor.kaiser.org, Snews <s-news@wubios.wustl.edu>
In-reply-to: <199803302355.LAA24663@grunt.marc.cri.nz>
Sender: owner-s-news@wubios.wustl.edu
Rather than given an overall impression of which particular implentation
of S you think is faster than another, I would find it more helpful if you
gave concrete examples.  Perhaps a judicious use of dos.time() and
unix.time()?


({[({[({[({[({[({[({[({[({[({[({[([])]})]})]})]})]})]})]})]})]})]})]})
Barry Courtois                                1001 Broadway, Suite 215
  Biostatistical Core                           Seattle, WA 98122-4304
  Center for AIDS and STD                        Phone: (206) 720-4280
  University of Washington Box 359931              Fax: (206) 720-5003
 

On Tue, 31 Mar 1998, Patrick Connolly wrote:

> According to jxs@dor.kaiser.org:
>    
> |> I agree completely with the above statement about the slowness of v.4. I 
> |> also stick to v. 3.3 for Windows. Still the Unix version 3.4 (which I 
> |> run on a Sparc20) is much better. For my laptop (where I use the Windows 
> |> version) I am looking forward to the Linux version. Any news about that?
> |> 
> |>      I don't agree with the above statement. It depends on the system you 
> are 
> |>      using. If you run Windows NT, the V4 runs much better than the v3.3. 
> Of 
> |>      cause, you need a powerful machine. I have pentium pro 200 and 256MB. 
> I 
> |>      think 32MB is too little and you need to get more, then you will be 
> happier 
> |>      with the V4.
> 
> I too have tried V4 and NT on a pentium pro 200 and 256MB with two
> processors and not a lot of users, but it is still far slower than
> V3.4 on a 40Mhz unix machine (that's forty, not four hundred).
> 
> On the same machine, Excel and Word take about 2 seconds to start.  S4
> takes more than 20 seconds!  Even then, it won't run in two
> directories simultaneously which is something I have a wont and want
> to do nearly all the time.  The latter might well be a limitation of
> the OS rather than S4 itself.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was distributed by s-news@wubios.wustl.edu.  To unsubscribe
> send e-mail to s-news-request@wubios.wustl.edu with the BODY of the
> message:  unsubscribe s-news
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by s-news@wubios.wustl.edu.  To unsubscribe
send e-mail to s-news-request@wubios.wustl.edu with the BODY of the
message:  unsubscribe s-news

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>