| To: | S-NEWS <s-news@wubios.wustl.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [S] Gamma distribution functions |
| From: | Joseph F Lucke <jlu100+@imap.pitt.edu> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:48:38 -0500 |
| Sender: | owner-s-news@wubios.wustl.edu |
I am having trouble with the functions for the gamma distribution for small parameter values, say shape=.001 and rate=.001, which has mean 1 and variance 1000. For these values I get > qgamma(c(.01,.05,.25,.50,.75,.95,,.99), .001,.001) [1] 1.000000e-051 1.000000e-051 1.000000e-051 5.244206e-299 6.470515e-123 2.973588e-020 [7] 2.425943e-002 which are clearly wrong. For values exceeding .01, the functions appear to work fine. Is it documented someplace what the lower bounds of the parameters must be to maintain accuracy? Joe Lucke
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [S] estimates of the untransformed coefficients after the use ofpoly(), Frank E Harrell Jr |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [S] HOWTO - special characters on axis labels?, Jonathan Monteleone |
| Previous by Thread: | [S] estimates of the untransformed coefficients after the use of poly(), Daniel Erdin |
| Next by Thread: | [S] HOWTO - special characters on axis labels?, Jonathan Monteleone |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |