| To: | s-news@wubios.wustl.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [S] spatial.cor, binary |
| From: | Jane Elith <j.elith@botany.unimelb.edu.au> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 May 2000 12:31:35 +1000 |
| Sender: | owner-s-news@wubios.wustl.edu |
|
Dear Splus, A colleague has a question about the computation of a 2-outcome spatial autocorrelation index using the spatial.cor function in S+ Spatial stats. At present it appears the binary option has been withdrawn, leaving only the Moran's i and Geary's c options available. Neither of these options appear to be suited to binary outcome data. If you have experience with this function or know how implement it with binary outcome data could you email him directly?: Brendan Wintle b.wintle1@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au (we work with S+ v4.5 on Win NT or Win 95, and Spatial Stats v1.1) Here is his request: I've been trying to compute the spatial correlation index for binary (presence/absence) data using the spatial.cor function in spatial stats. The manual I have (v1, 1996) tells me that I can use the option; statistic="binary"(pg D-71). When I use this option (on v1.1 1999), it returns Error; 'statistic "binary" not implemented in this version'. Can you please tell me why this option was withdrawn? If I use the 'statistic="moran" option on a binary outcome set in spatial stats, is the computed result equivalent to the binary measure of spatial association? If not, do I have any other options for computing Moran's (1948) two-outcome measure of spatial association. Here is part of an answer from Mathsoft: >>>> I found an existing bug report saying that the "spatial.cor()" function<<<< We appreaciate any help, Jane Elith ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was distributed by s-news@wubios.wustl.edu. To unsubscribe send e-mail to s-news-request@wubios.wustl.edu with the BODY of the message: unsubscribe s-news |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [S] Re:, Shige Song |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [S] ls vs. objects, Martin Maechler |
| Previous by Thread: | [S] ls vs. objects, Wright, Kevin |
| Next by Thread: | [S] Rand and Cohen's kappa, Heeringa W.J. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |