s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [S] Off: Dual Processors & MegaMemory

To: Joseph F Lucke <jlu100+@imap.pitt.edu>
Subject: Re: [S] Off: Dual Processors & MegaMemory
From: "Mike Prager" <Mike.Prager@noaa.gov>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 07:43:52 -0400
Cc: S News Mailing List <s-news@wubios.wustl.edu>
In-reply-to: <392C3347.C72471D2@imap.pitt.edu>
References: <200005241901.UAA22486@irwell.mimas.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-s-news@wubios.wustl.edu

At 5/24/00 at 03:53 PM, you wrote:

I am in the market for a new machine.  Is there any advantage to S+ in
having dual CPUs in Windows 2000 or NT?

I have been using dual-processor machines for Windows NT, and before that OS/2, for about 4 years now. I find that they are worth it. Very little, if any, software takes advantage of the second processor directly. However, if you need to do other work while a long job in S+ is running, having the extra processor is extremely convenient in giving far better response time. Also, one can run two long jobs simultaneously, and each effectively uses one processor, giving close to twice the throughput.

...MHP


--
Michael Prager      <Mike.Prager@noaa.gov>
NOAA Beaufort Laboratory
Beaufort, North Carolina  28516  USA

Standard Disclaimers:
* Opinions expressed here are personal and are not otherwise represented.
* Any use of tradenames does not constitute a NOAA or NMFS endorsement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by s-news@wubios.wustl.edu.  To unsubscribe
send e-mail to s-news-request@wubios.wustl.edu with the BODY of the
message:  unsubscribe s-news

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>