s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

glm(family=Gamma)

To: s-news@wubios.wustl.edu
Subject: glm(family=Gamma)
From: Ed Jones <ejones@stat.tamucc.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 21:25:37 -0600
Reply-to: ejones@stat.tamucc.edu
This is a bit of a minor question, but can anyone explain why Splus
appears to use 1/mu as the link function for the Gamma distribution
rather than -1/mu ? 

I know this is not a big issue, but it seems inconsistent with the
parameterization presented in popular texts on this subject, such as the
book by McCullagh & Nelder, or the more recent book by Venables and
Ripley. Could it cause some confusion in interpreting the Splus glm
coefficients for the Gamma family?

Thanks - ed

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • glm(family=Gamma), Ed Jones <=