s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Proportional odds assumption

To: s-news <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu>
Subject: Re: Proportional odds assumption
From: Frank E Harrell Jr <fharrell@virginia.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:25:25 -0400
Organization: University of Virginia
The Design library's lrm and associated resid functions
provide diagnostics for the PO assumption.  I prefer
graphical methods as some of the formal tests that
have been proposed are anti-conservative.  -Frank Harrell

"Coppenolle, Hans" wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Does the possibility exist in s-plus 2000
> to test the proportional odds assumption
> when fitting a proportional odds model?
> 
> The function polr seems not to include that
> property...
> 
> How can the goodness of fit of a logistic proportional odds
> model and a generalized (baseline) logistic model
> efficiently be compared??
> 
> Thank you in advance...
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was distributed by s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu.  To
> unsubscribe send e-mail to s-news-request@lists.biostat.wustl.edu with
> the BODY of the message:  unsubscribe s-news

-- 
Frank E Harrell Jr              Prof. of Biostatistics & Statistics
Div. of Biostatistics & Epidem. Dept. of Health Evaluation Sciences
U. Virginia School of Medicine  http://hesweb1.med.virginia.edu/biostat

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>