s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

placing BATCH into background

To: s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
Subject: placing BATCH into background
From: aczarn@cs.uwa.edu.au
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 07:51:14 +0800
Cc: aczarn@cs.uwa.edu.au
to anyone who can assist

i apologize in advance for what may be a very trivial question.

i am using Version 5.1 Release 1 for Linux 2.0.31 : 1999.

in the manual it states that if you want a BATCH job to be placed 
into the background you enter as follows

Splus BATCH file.in file.out &

however the following URL suggests that when running under unix
the & is not needed, see at

http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/sscc/pubs/7-11.pdf

i have tried entering without the & and a unix prompt is returned 
which suggests that the job is running in background ie BATCH 
appears to automatically place the job in the background, under
UNIX anyway (apparently Splus BATCH file.in file.out is
equivalent to R BATCH file.in file.out &).

however what i would like to know is if the job is really in the 
background in the same way in which unix will place a job in the 
background using &, ie, will the job respond to all unix commands 
accordingly used to manipulate jobs which are in background.

just checking to see if anyone has had any experience with this in 
the past. 

thanks in advance

andrew

Dr AST Czarn


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • placing BATCH into background, aczarn <=