s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: glmmPQL() and explained deviance... ?

To: <msc0235@geo.ed.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: glmmPQL() and explained deviance... ?
From: ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 17:41:16 +0100 (BST)
Cc: <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu>
In-reply-to: <001301c2453c$5230f650$7d54d781@geo.ed.ac.uk>
Because PQL does not calculate a likelihood, you can't get a deviance.
It's part of the price for a computationally feasible procedure.

On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 msc0235@geo.ed.ac.uk wrote:

> I would like to calculate the percentage explained deviance for models
> obtained with the glmmPQL() procedure, but I do not get any Null deviance or
> residual deviance in the glmmPQL() output. Would anyone know of a way around
> this?

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>