s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Wilcoxin-Mann-Whitney rank sums test

To: Howard Stauffer <hbs2@humboldt.edu>
Subject: Re: Wilcoxin-Mann-Whitney rank sums test
From: Frank E Harrell Jr <fharrell@virginia.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:20:43 -0400
Cc: s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20021025131006.02358d08@axe.humboldt.edu>
Organization: University of Virginia
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021025131006.02358d08@axe.humboldt.edu>
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:13:40 -0700
Howard Stauffer <hbs2@humboldt.edu> wrote:

> Oct. 25
> 
> Non-parametric statisticians,
> 
> Please resolve a controversial issue for me over use of the 
> Wilcoxin-Mann-Whitney rank sums test.  Is it appropriately applied to two 
> populations that are heteroscedastic?  References seem
> to be in conflict over this question.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Professor Howard Stauffer
> Humboldt State University

Yes, it is appropriate but it may not test a simple location shift in that 
case.  In other words, it won't test purely for a difference in means or 
medians.  It always tests a more general hypothesis, though, namely H0: Prob[X 
> Y] = 0.5.  X > Y means "a randomly chosen observation from the first 
treatment group is larger than a randomly chosen observation from the second 
group".
-- 
Frank E Harrell Jr              Prof. of Biostatistics & Statistics
Div. of Biostatistics & Epidem. Dept. of Health Evaluation Sciences
U. Virginia School of Medicine  http://hesweb1.med.virginia.edu/biostat

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>