s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: GEE & YAGS

To: "Paul, David A" <paulda@BATTELLE.ORG>
Subject: Re: GEE & YAGS
From: <ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:42:28 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: "'s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu'" <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu>
In-reply-to: <CFA6739DD532764AA51E7459970BF0E205D0A956@ns-bco-mse3.im.battelle.org>
A multinomial model requires multiple responses.  So there can be no
`multinomial family', in glm let alone in gee or yags.  All assume a
univariate response variable.



On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Paul, David  A wrote:

> In the documentation for the "family" function which
> generates an object of type "family", it is stated that
>
> "...'quasi' can be used to combine any available link and
> variance function... The function 'power' can also be used
> to generate a powerlink function object for use with 'quasi';
> 'power' takes an argument 'lambda'. Users can construct their
> own families, as long as they have compatible components
> having the same names as those, for example, of binomial.
> The easiest way is to use 'quasi' with home-made link and
> variance objects; otherwise 'make.family' can be used, or
> else direct construction of the family object. When passed
> as an argument to 'glm' or 'gam' with the default link, the empty
> parentheses () can be omitted. There is a print method for
> the class 'family'."
>
> As I read it, this indicates that the multinomial family
> could be constructed from scratch.  Is this true?  If so,
> has anyone implemented GEE or YAGS with a multinomial family?

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • GEE & YAGS, Paul, David A
    • Re: GEE & YAGS, ripley <=