s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

minbucket in rpart, second question

To: s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
Subject: minbucket in rpart, second question
From: "Isabelle Robichaud" <irobichaud@myrealbox.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 08:36:04 +0800
Dear S-Plus people, 

Regarding my question on getting different trees (with rpart, after 
cross-validation 
and the 1-SE rule) with different setting of minbucket in rpart.control, Andy 
Liaw 
replied to me that it's normal to expect not necessarily to get the same trees. 
Then 
my question is: how does one choose which setting of minbucket is appropriate 
for 
their problem? Because I get quite different results with minbucket=1 then if I 
leave 
it on the default. Is a tree pruned from the "total" tree (i.e. minbucket=1) 
better 
reflecting the data? My interest is not in prediction but description. I have 
two data 
sets, one of 170 observations and the other of 506.

Thanks again,

Isabelle Robichaud
p.s. S-Plus 6.1 on Win98.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • minbucket in rpart, second question, Isabelle Robichaud <=