| To: | <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Summary: Gumbel Distribution |
| From: | "Lambert.Winnie" <lambert.winnie@ensco.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 May 2003 17:25:28 -0400 |
| Thread-index: | AcMhcdTW8IbHBMhlQSiDJOu/JaMn9g== |
| Thread-topic: | Summary: Gumbel Distribution |
|
Thanks much to Sam
Buttrey, Ravi Varadhan, Rolf Turner, and Simon Rosenfeld. All inputs were
helpful, but the suggestion that held the clue needed by my co-worker was from
Rolf:
Your co-worker may have omitted the normalizing constants. The relevant fact is that if X_(n) = max{X_1, ..., X_n} where the X_i are iid random variables from a distribution ``in the domain of attraction'' of the Gumbel distribution then P((X_(n) - a_n)/b_n <= x) ---> G(x) = exp(-exp(-x)) as n ---> infinity, where the a_n and b_n are ``normalizing constants'' which depend on the particular distribution that the X_i come from. The normalizing constants for the standard normal distribution are: ln(4 pi) + ln ln n a_n = sqrt(2 ln n) - ------------------- 2(sqrt(2 ln n)) 1 b_n = ------------------ sqrt(2 ln n) That is: If you repeatedly generate samples of size n (where n is ``large'') from a N(mu,sigma^2) distribution, standardize these samples (form Z_i = (X_i - mu)/sigma), take the max of the Z_i, and then form G = (Z_max - a_n)/b_n and thereby get a whole bunch of G's, then the histogram of the G's will look very much like the graph of G(x) = exp(-exp(-x)). ********************************************** |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Broken Digests and workaround, Erich Schraer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | This must be easy, but..., Kim Elmore |
| Previous by Thread: | Broken Digests and workaround, Erich Schraer |
| Next by Thread: | This must be easy, but..., Kim Elmore |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |