| To: | <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Frailty term in survival analysis |
| From: | "Monti, Gustavo" <Gustavo.Monti@wur.nl> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 May 2003 10:00:29 +0200 |
| Thread-index: | AcMluFNiti4ie5GvEdePJAABA7qTrQ== |
| Thread-topic: | Frailty term in survival analysis |
|
Dear S-Users:
I have some questions related with the interpretation of
the outcomes of S-plus for Cox models with frailties.
I have fitted a model from data pooled from
several research groups consisting in variables reflecting
attributes of the individuals and also I was interest in assess if there
is any important effect due to differences between groups (protocols,
facilities, quality of personnel etc.).
For that
purpose I used the Cox model with frailty proposed in the book of Therneau &
Grambsch. Also they show a way to calculate the Kendall's tau for a
gamma or gaussian frailty. The first question is: this correlation
of subjects within group (KT) can be interpreted as % of homogeneity
of individuals due to the research group effect, or is the % of homogeneity
of individuals due to their individual attributes and the rest is due to the
group effect?
The second question is about the interpretation of
Rsquare. Is it the proportion of the total variance explained by
group effect?
Finally; Is
there other better option? I have
interval-censored data.
I have a
S-plus 2000 R3 on a PC under Windows.
Thanks in
advance;
My best
regards;
Gustavo Monti E-mail: Gustavo.Monti@WUR.nl |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | dll load, Mandans |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: dll load, Prof Brian Ripley |
| Previous by Thread: | dll load, Mandans |
| Next by Thread: | Summary: Text for individual panels in a trellis plot, John Payne |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |