| To: | "s-news" <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | 3 Dimensional Cross Variance |
| From: | "Paul Lasky" <phlasky@earthlink.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:25:34 -0700 |
| Reply-to: | phlasky@earthlink.net |
|
This is a pretty basic question but . . . is there a better way, without explicit looping, to compute the 3 dimensional cross variance and a diagonal ? The crossvariance defined as:
crossvar = array( rep( NA, p^3 ), dim=c ( p, p, p ) )
for( i in 1 : p )
{
for( j in 1 : p )
{
for( k in 1 : p )
{
crossvar[ i, j, k ] = 0.5 * t( x[ , i ] ) % * % Q[ , , k] % * % x[ , j ]
}
}
}
where x are the bi-variates, and Q is the covariance array.
The diag(crossvar) is defined as:
crossvar.diag = matrix( rep( NA, p^2), nrow = p)
for ( i in 1: p )
{
for( j in 1: p )
{
crossvar.diag[ i, j ] = 0.5 * t ( x[ , i] ) % * % Q[ , , j ] % * % x[ , i ]
}
}
Paul Lasky
P & B Consultants
Rancho Santa Fe, CA .
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Glm and problem with a particular value of the categorica, Southworth, Harry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 3 Dimensional Cross Variance, Nick.Ellis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Glm and problem with a particular value of the categorica, Southworth, Harry |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 3 Dimensional Cross Variance, Nick.Ellis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |