| To: | S-News <s-news@wubios.wustl.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Windows 2000 Pro vs. XP Pro and S-Plus |
| From: | "Kim Elmore" <Kim.Elmore@noaa.gov> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 May 2004 14:28:46 -0500 |
I seek the group's collective experience: are there any significant
performance differences when running S-Plus 6.2 under Windows XP Pro vs.
Windows 2000 Pro? For example, is S-Plus faster under XP Pro than under
Windows 2000 Pro, or does it behave differently in any other way? As far as
S-Plus is concerned, is there any reason to choose one windows OS over the
other over the other?
Kim Elmore
Kim Elmore, Ph.D.
University of Oklahoma
Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies
"All of weather is divided into three parts: Yes, No, and Maybe. The
greatest of these is Maybe" The original Latin appears to be garbled.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | if-statement in sas.get from hmisc library, Augustyns, Ilse [PRDBE] |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. XP Pro and S-Plus, Marc R. Feldesman |
| Previous by Thread: | if-statement in sas.get from hmisc library, Augustyns, Ilse [PRDBE] |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Windows 2000 Pro vs. XP Pro and S-Plus, Marc R. Feldesman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |