s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

order in browser mode

To: s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
Subject: order in browser mode
From: Jewel Bright <jwlbright@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:31:51 -0800 (PST)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=GGCRhGqRmzNp7jX/NxS2O7eZgv2KNs7qoxFaCt5aNGAaDylkfb8/OIbyFpceHx8xsgB/wUBG4+gmtv9FtDl6CjTPgMOygt9J4JUrvKW8mNHmLLj++2JbWC0u2bFQkMiKGjNltMJNTS7iLT68np79uuRquaS/C0d4DZCtmMKU20w= ;
Dear S-PLUS users:
Recently I switched from  S-PLUS-2000 to S-PLUS 6.2. Among many differences, I discovered the following one which I believe is unfortunate, (of course, if I am not missing something). It is related to the 'browser()' function. In S-PLUS 2000, when you type the question mark while in browser mode, the variable being browsed are generally ordered in the order of their assignments in your function. If for example you had two adjacent statements in your function like
x<-bla1
y<-bla2
then in browser mode the variables x and y would be adjacent too.
 
In S-PLUS 6.2, the variables seem to be listed chaotically, neither alphabetically nor chronologically. If your function is cumbersome and contains a couple of dozen of intermediate parameters, then the search becomes a challenging task
 
My question: is there any logic behind ordering the variables in browser()?
Is that possible to somehow control this order?
Thank you in advance
 
Jewel Bright
 
 
 


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>