| To: | s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | REML Models for unreplicated treatments |
| From: | Mark.Hearnden@nt.gov.au |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:41:38 +0930 |
|
Dear S-listers I have a client with data from a large unreplicated monitoring trial. I haven't had much experience with REML's but this has been suggested as the best approach. Treatments are applied to individual paddocks, i.e. one treatment per paddock, and the data (yield etc) collected from quadrats along transects (by multiple observers) nested within each paddock. I'm using lme with paddock and transect as random factors similar to the example in Crawley (2002) pp 673-676 (however my design is unbalanced). If the treatments are A, and the transects are B is this the correct model: model <- lme(y ~ 1, random=~1|A/B, data = ""> or should I be treating A as fixed and using a model like: model <- lme(y ~ A, random=~1|B, data = ""> What's the best way to add a continuous covariate (y ~ c + A, random= ~1 | B)? Any prod in the right direction would be appreciated. (Using S+ 6.2 with XP) Regards MNH ================================================================= Dr MARK HEARNDEN Department of Business Industry and Resource Development GPO Box 3000 DARWIN NT 0801 Tel: (08) 8999 2131 Fax: (08) 8999 2200 Email: Mark.Hearnden@nt.gov.au ================================================================= |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Usefulness of chisqr.gof, John Fennick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | IDA 2005: LAST CALL FOR PAPERS, IDA 2005 |
| Previous by Thread: | Usefulness of chisqr.gof, John Fennick |
| Next by Thread: | IDA 2005: LAST CALL FOR PAPERS, IDA 2005 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |