| To: | s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | cov.wt |
| From: | Joe Cerniglia <cj5815@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:53:01 -0700 (PDT) |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rX6aw+8xw8vP2MGkdzjUCjBwkGnt8g0tNhmt42qPg5o63WtGwAZZ6yXzAQqoGlrrROBM4shCHGpILGWJ615bsrzGqNP+khMRd/sEUnZeWIzaqXi4yXLb9xtze57/Rh3lAl3glSe4inUtUTngA+Vyw1dDD5BaboWDdyOdT/z1wrY= ; |
I am using cov.wt to calculate the covariance matrix. I have several alternative methods for calculating the weights of observations in this function. Is there a method available to determine which of my weigthing methods is optimal? Thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: simple function, Richard M. Heiberger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Unbalanced nesting S+ code for design variables, Shakir Hussain |
| Previous by Thread: | simple function, Leeds, Mark |
| Next by Thread: | Unbalanced nesting S+ code for design variables, Shakir Hussain |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |