s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Concerns about SPLUS version 7

To: "Liaw, Andy" <andy_liaw@merck.com>
Subject: Re: Concerns about SPLUS version 7
From: Patrick Burns <pburns@pburns.seanet.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:35:12 +0100
Cc: 'Thomas Jagger' <tjagger@blarg.net>, s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
In-reply-to: <39B6DDB9048D0F4DAD42CB26AAFF0AFA64EA92@usctmx1106.Merck.com>
References: <39B6DDB9048D0F4DAD42CB26AAFF0AFA64EA92@usctmx1106.Merck.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 StumbleUpon/1.995 (ax)


Liaw, Andy wrote:

I'll chip in my $0.02:

...

4. BDR said in one of his talks a few years ago that R probably has more bugs than S-PLUS. However, bugs in R get fixed a lot quicker than in S-PLUS. Also, R is developed at a much faster pace than S-PLUS. That it may have more bugs is understandable.


Things may have changed substantially in a few years. The relative number of bugs in each package is a difficult quantity to estimate, and it will depend on what your definition is of 'R' and 'S-PLUS'. However, my personal experience is categorically different: I've found S-PLUS (for Windows) to have a number of
bugs, and R to have only an occasional minor bug.


Patrick Burns

Burns Statistics
patrick@burns-stat.com
+44 (0)20 8525 0696
http://www.burns-stat.com
(home of S Poetry and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User")




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>