| To: | s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Mixed effects models and R2 |
| From: | GRAHAM LEASK <grahamleask@btopenworld.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:06:11 +0000 (GMT) |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=u8He7epnP/tnEtXKmaQE0C5MUw+PvzFTg2vx86mKd97PAU97S2/BmgSi4s2bMRy0pLF1MpSfhWKj3Is1M2v2y3sp15hALQhIzk7Pvpt4AITnOAyYWDyVojWHHctq7yQNIrYyWIx5uaFJ9GiRIH228DAv0XXAhIbmDSguPTtiqkg= ; |
|
With mixed effects models in S plus is it feasible to describe models in terms of how much of the variation explained? If so how do I gain an estimate of how much of the variation is explained by the model (i.e. an R2 figure). I am using S plus 7.0 but have relatively little experience in using this software. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Thanks and another question, Chen,Sichong |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mixed effects models and R2, Roberts, J. Kyle |
| Previous by Thread: | Thanks and another question, Chen,Sichong |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Mixed effects models and R2, Roberts, J. Kyle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |