s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Mixed effects models and R2

To: "GRAHAM LEASK" <grahamleask@btopenworld.com>, <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu>
Subject: Re: Mixed effects models and R2
From: "Roberts, J. Kyle" <jkrobert@bcm.tmc.edu>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:10:34 -0600
References: <20060218110611.99429.qmail@web86203.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Thread-index: AcY0e28tU8/wKpd4T8WvqW3FP4qs9QAZE31Z
Thread-topic: [S] Mixed effects models and R2
Graham,
 
Don't report any R^2 statistic for any mixed effects model.  Snijders & Bosker and Hox give lengthy discussions on why not to.  I am presenting a paper at AERA this year on possible R^2 measures for 2-level linear models, but I assure you that it is not easy, nor straight-forward.  If you look on my website at:
Dataset 1 actually gives an example where adding a covariate increases the variance at level-2, which would mean negative variance explained (something not possible in OLS).  Typically, an R^2-type metric makes little sense in HLM/mixed effects models.
 
I hope that this helps,
Kyle
 
***************************************
J. Kyle Roberts, Ph.D.
Baylor College of Medicine
Center for Educational Outreach
One Baylor Plaza, MS:  BCM411
Houston, TX   77030-3411
713-798-6672 - 713-798-8201 Fax
***************************************
 


From: s-news-owner@lists.biostat.wustl.edu on behalf of GRAHAM LEASK
Sent: Sat 2/18/2006 5:06 AM
To: s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
Subject: [S] Mixed effects models and R2

With mixed effects models in S plus is it feasible to describe models in terms of how much of the variation explained? If so how do I gain an estimate of how much of the variation is explained by the model (i.e. an R2 figure).
 
I am using S plus 7.0 but have relatively little experience in using this software.
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>