| To: | "'Frank E Harrell Jr'" <f.harrell@vanderbilt.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Large-scale least-squares regression (was: automate writing formulas) |
| From: | "Alan Hochberg" <alan.hochberg@prosanos.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:41:06 -0400 |
| Cc: | "'Kamil Toth'" <kamiltoth@yahoo.com>, <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu> |
| In-reply-to: | <44CE2AEA.9000100@vanderbilt.edu> |
| Thread-index: | Aca0u20qY5e7uijDSpun7Tkp23A/bAAAqeeQ |
Your point is well taken. When Acton's quote was written, your 300 variables might come from 300 sensors on an aircraft or a chemical reactor, and there was a chance that physical and engineering insight might tell you which five or six variables to start with, and which ones might add information not already included in the model. Nowadays, the flood of variables is likely to come from a microarray or an image sensor. Insight plays less of a role, and we're left with the strategy of asking the data which variables to use, which, as you pointed out, is an iffy proposition. Thanks for the note and the reference. Alan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: automate writing formulas, Frank E Harrell Jr |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Re: automate writing formulas, Frank E Harrell Jr |
| Next by Thread: | Re: automate writing formulas, ONKELINX, Thierry |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |