s-news
[Top] [All Lists]

inconsistent results for survReg() vs censorReg()

To: <s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu>
Subject: inconsistent results for survReg() vs censorReg()
From: "Feng Gao" <feng@wubios.wustl.edu>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:02:31 -0600
Importance: Normal

Dear S+ users:

I am fitting parametric models to a censored data. Currently there are two choices in Splus - survReg or censorReg. My understanding is that, based on the manual, the only difference is that censorReg is more powerful in handling complicated cases such as left truncation/interval censoring. So, they should have the same performance for a “simpler” data. Below I fitted an exponential model to a right censored data, and there is a rather big inconsistence, especially the intercept.

My questions are: 1) is there any trick in model parameterization for these two functions? 2) if not, which should I believe? 3) if yes, where should I get more details?

Many thanks for your comments

Feng

   

censorReg(formula = censor(t2, c) ~ age + vcd + iop + psd + cct, data = "" style='mso-spacerun:yes'>  distribution = "exponential")

(Intercept)       age        vcd        iop        psd       cct

    5.284502 -0.583164 -0.2693929 -0.1353391 -0.1331131 -1.022518

Log-likelihood: -688.2034

 

survReg(formula = Surv(t2, c) ~ age + vcd + iop + psd + cct, data = "" dist = "exponential")

Coefficients:

 (Intercept)        age        vcd        iop         psd        cct

    1.573442 -0.2785216 -0.2576163 -0.1005846 -0.09998574 -0.6032965

Loglik(model)= -493.4   Loglik(intercept only)= -537

 

Feng Gao, Ph.D.
Division of Biostatistics,
Washington University School of Medicine
Campus
Box 8067, 660 S. Euclid Av.
St. Louis, MO 63110-1093
Phone: 314-362-3682
Fax:     314-362-3728

The materials contained in this e-mail are private and confidential and are the property of the sender.  If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • inconsistent results for survReg() vs censorReg(), Feng Gao <=