| To: | s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | cholesky-like algorithm |
| From: | "John Pitchard" <johnpitchard@googlemail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:59:13 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=khYaatze8V9MAtBKrOs13u+LB2BvHu7vcaF1nskj7GztjPNW8y5n9l3aTWADj0u8ehiqJTviFub1ZcU+ITgwoD+zOHAQPDqEoI/5+4ccmf7UCVMbVnLBRW4Z4FhI/XVys8Mra+vVSlKbvpvcE5OFM1wxfaXxf0wXk1wnaK5JEzI= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=UQ/TI2ypAKgRvJ7r1FARttoRbUqEmHEozaY8m5VP1OprWuGhKjfINrL0qdHvMTE5QVnuYglAaWXA2Pbqshsa8+bWYBpaFwiz9B/h5RMmo8n/AjlDsEAocfTtlUZ788V5BUHgqdLHvIgshGW1uSzUzOjCHredJoM8uZdtNjbUqgQ= |
|
Dear all,
I would like to solve the following set of equations:
x(1) =b(11)* f(1) x(2)=b(21)*f(1)+b(22)*f(2) x(3)=b(31)*f(1)+b(32)*f(2) +b(33)*f(3) x(4)=b(41)*f(1)+b(42)*f(2) +b(43)*f(3)+b(44)*f(4) x(5)=b(51)*f(1)+b(52)*f(2) +b(53)*f(3)+b(54)*f(5)+b(55)*f(5) x(6)=b(61)*f(1)+b(62)*f(2) +b(63)*f(3)+b(64)*f(5)+b(65)*f(6))+b(66)*f(6) .... .... etc where the number in brackets is the subscript.
The vectors x(1), x(2) and x(3) are known beforehand.
I have 2 correlation matrices: the first with the actual correlations between the 3 variables x(1), x(2) and x(3). The second matrix has the target correlations between x(1), x(2),... etc
The actual matrix is put in the target because these are the true correlations between the variables, i.e. target.correlation.matrix[1:3,1:3] <- true.correlation.matrix However, the resulting matrix is not positive-definite.
Is it still possible to solve the system of equations where f(4), f(5),... are random vectors sampled from a standard normal distribution? I essentially want to calculate the b's first followed by the x's. Is there an agorithm to do this?
I would be grateful for some help. Many thanks, John |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | random positions of fixed length, Jewel Bright |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: random positions of fixed length, David L Lorenz |
| Previous by Thread: | random positions of fixed length, Jewel Bright |
| Next by Thread: | WEIGHTS in lme, Hunsicker, Lawrence |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |