s-news
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[FWD: test for correlation: permutation or parametric]

from [courses] [Bookmark Link][Original]
To: timh@insightful.com
Subject: [FWD: test for correlation: permutation or parametric]
From: courses@zanybooks.com
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:28:45 -0700
Cc: s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.10.24



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: test for correlation: permutation or parametric
From: drgood@zanybooks.com
Date: Wed, September 19, 2007 6:26 am
To: courses@zanybooks.com

Pearson's correlation is remarkably robust.  I found no advantage to the permutation test in extensive simulations with non-normal data.

Phillip Good
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [FWD: test for correlation: permutation or parametric], courses <=
Previous by Date:  Microarray Workshop in Tucson, January 2008, David Henderson
Next by Date:  S-PLUS User Conference: Half Off Discount, Kim Kelly
Previous by Thread:  Microarray Workshop in Tucson, January 2008, David Henderson
Next by Thread:  S-PLUS User Conference: Half Off Discount, Kim Kelly
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]