Re: is there a way to compile Splus program into standalone executables?

[Michael <comtech.usa@gmail.com>]

The scheduler will not be in Splus. Probably it will be some Script language.

It's sure that one subblock will be in SPlus, and others will be in R
or Matlab, or other language.

Need to automate their runs smoothly...

I am the end user myself. Of course it might be better to run without Splus.

Any thoughts?

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:14 PM, James P. Howard, II <jh@jameshoward.us> wrote:
> What platform will be using?  Does the scheduler have to be written in
>  S-Plus?  Would simply automating the run process be sufficient?  Will
>  the end user have S-Plus installed?
>
>  James
>
>
>
>
>
>  On 2/28/08, Michael <comtech.usa@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Hi all,
>  >
>  > Is there a way to compile SPlus program into standalone executables?
>  >
>  > The reason for asking this is that I want to have a overall scheduler
>  > sitting on top of the bottom level functional blocks.
>  >
>  > Some functional blocks have to be in Splus. Some have to be in R. And
>  > some other blocks have to be in Matlab.
>  >
>  > My overall scheduler will make sure they all run in an orderly fashion.
>  >
>  > Thus it's important to be able to compile Splus into some sort of
>  > standalone executable code.
>  >
>  > Thanks
>  > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > This message was distributed by s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu.  To
>  > unsubscribe send e-mail to s-news-request@lists.biostat.wustl.edu with
>  > the BODY of the message:  unsubscribe s-news
>  >
>
>
>  --
>  James P. Howard, II
>  jh@jameshoward.us
>  http://jameshoward.us
>