| To: | Michael <comtech.usa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: is there a way to compile Splus program into standalone executables? |
| From: | "James P. Howard, II" <jh@jameshoward.us> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:55:37 -0500 |
| Cc: | s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=aThPjfOQ3kr11o3Pv/pMsCw4w//dsu2+ytfEozGyN0Q=; b=QLb1rihtu0p9jKrgejOE/Xf74t2vFvQVtgbiV8wiZDPkbFms1wue5jyfRb4QtOsTc0cHMcAmTfEYstxUtxCS0pwYCj2elSsxiSTUbCJjfC/AYjYnqFowyspGyK3KT98AAWzYYZ+xXwhUv3kHApFXRkLCGkK/LP0/QOfSDCGf2QY= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Wc0aT1Al6cDtT3cxDRG0TI2pCaaV0iQo6yQGRiZfsg2CCIa62RT8zNxF97G3pMAECGhmTCjR/HhwlDqRTmQ+0CKOFu8CKq31+u9YcmlKjQm82mYnOPivirDtqbk6qNTnpXwf1hO9rmALBhygdY45QmLfwdFaXAbekjgmZEgiXqg= |
| In-reply-to: | <b1f16d9d0802281337p244fe019u2e1263a81305fe66@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <b1f16d9d0802281245r455f7e4dve0a118403bdbb41b@mail.gmail.com> <88a2333a0802281314y4f728049leb4c43d1c2d7947@mail.gmail.com> <b1f16d9d0802281337p244fe019u2e1263a81305fe66@mail.gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | jh@jameshoward.us |
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Michael <comtech.usa@gmail.com> wrote: > The scheduler will not be in Splus. Probably it will be some Script language. > > It's sure that one subblock will be in SPlus, and others will be in R > or Matlab, or other language. > > Need to automate their runs smoothly... > > I am the end user myself. Of course it might be better to run without Splus. > > Any thoughts? Most likely, it would be sufficient to automate S-Plus to run a script, which is relatively easy, rather than compiling to binary. So in your scheduler script, under Unix, you do this: Splus < foo.s or Splus BATCH foo.s foo.out Under Windows, something similar ought to work. James -- James P. Howard, II jh@jameshoward.us http://jameshoward.us |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Supersmoother port to C?, Kim Elmore |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | SuperSmoother (again), Kim Elmore |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: is there a way to compile Splus program into standalone executables?, Michael |
| Next by Thread: | SuperSmoother (again), Kim Elmore |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |